𝕏

zero optimization

Message boards : Number crunching : zero optimization
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Jozef J

Send message
Joined: 27 Apr 15
Posts: 1
Credit: 889,166
RAC: 0
Message 416 - Posted: 29 Aug 2015, 13:13:51 UTC

I have tried increase my daily rac connect my all the computers what I have but I can not get over 12-14 thousand per day.
as if something prevented by increasing the efficiency of connecting other computers.
quite shocking.
My 12 core data barely 12 thousand rac per day for 24 hypertreading process. for monts..but/ass !
I joined for the 3 days my overclocked 8 core 5960x and my rac increased by only one thousandth + in few days... + 4820 HQ notebook core ...!!!!
It is something in this project nicely F**** and I'm not going to be further promoted this project.
ID: 416 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Coleslaw
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 15
Posts: 9
Credit: 5,000,570
RAC: 0
Message 418 - Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 2:31:56 UTC - in response to Message 416.  

I have tried increase my daily rac connect my all the computers what I have but I can not get over 12-14 thousand per day.
as if something prevented by increasing the efficiency of connecting other computers.
quite shocking.
My 12 core data barely 12 thousand rac per day for 24 hypertreading process. for monts..but/ass !
I joined for the 3 days my overclocked 8 core 5960x and my rac increased by only one thousandth + in few days... + 4820 HQ notebook core ...!!!!
It is something in this project nicely F**** and I'm not going to be further promoted this project.


Sorry to see a cruncher leave but not sad to see someone whom responds like this go. Perhaps you should have kindly posted in the forums first and users might have tried to assist you. I did see you had work units pending validation which may have been part of the issue you saw, but since you already stated that you are not going to further "promote this project" (assuming you mean support it) then it really doesn't matter now.
ID: 418 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Jesús Carro
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 15
Posts: 283
Credit: 2,748,608
RAC: 0
Message 422 - Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 14:12:22 UTC

Dear Jozef,
I agree with Coleslaw, I don't like to see volunteers going out of the project but to solve your problems we need communication.

We are trying to solve the problems you indicate to us, and many times, the solutions came from other volunteer in the forums (we never tire of thank you).

If you would like to continue crunching for this project, we can analyze what is happening. There is nothing blocking the increasing of RAC obtained by connecting more computers, so, we should find and explanation and a solution.

Best,
Jesús.
Jesús Carro
Universidad San Jorge
@InSilicoHeart
ID: 422 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Chilean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 15
Posts: 11
Credit: 3,149,460
RAC: 0
Message 424 - Posted: 30 Aug 2015, 23:35:38 UTC

12K RAC for 24 HT cores seems OK to me. My 8 HT cores gives me about 4.5k RAC.
ID: 424 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote
SighKo

Send message
Joined: 26 Apr 15
Posts: 2
Credit: 1,797,874
RAC: 0
Message 426 - Posted: 31 Aug 2015, 5:47:37 UTC

Try the optimized app in this thread. Huge speed improvement.


Optimized app thread
ID: 426 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : zero optimization