Got some beta 1.06 work!
log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Got some beta 1.06 work!

Author Message
Profile sir spuddly buddly
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 15
Posts: 47
Credit: 1,248,591
RAC: 0
Message 1086 - Posted: 28 Sep 2016, 21:16:15 UTC

Got some beta 1.06 workunits - is this another test run?
____________
LZ Loon
The Most Handsome Man on the Interweb (TM)

Profile jcastro
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 15
Posts: 218
Credit: 14,859
RAC: 0
Message 1087 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 10:01:40 UTC

Yes,
We are testing a double file checkpoint. But in the other hand, we are experimenting issues with the web server.

Regards, Joel.

Profile sir spuddly buddly
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 15
Posts: 47
Credit: 1,248,591
RAC: 0
Message 1088 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 10:26:59 UTC

Well after 9 hours and 20 minutes the two WU's I had blew themselves up. It was going real slow too.
____________
LZ Loon
The Most Handsome Man on the Interweb (TM)

Profile Henk Haneveld
Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 15
Posts: 6
Credit: 84,725
RAC: 0
Message 1089 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 10:58:22 UTC

After running to about 50% the result did a reset and then stayed at 0.35%.

I have aborted it.

Profile jcastro
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 15
Posts: 218
Credit: 14,859
RAC: 0
Message 1090 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 12:50:07 UTC

first 50 WUs had an error on the configuration file. We have cancel them and no more WUs will be sent with that configuration. The second group ( from 50 to 100) are corrects and seem to work (and end approximately in 3 hours)

[VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 15
Posts: 108
Credit: 403,294
RAC: 0
Message 1091 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 12:50:41 UTC - in response to Message 1088.

It was going real slow too.


Very long wus. After 8 h the wus are at 18%....
I need a Xeon cpu

Profile jcastro
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 15
Posts: 218
Credit: 14,859
RAC: 0
Message 1092 - Posted: 29 Sep 2016, 13:57:27 UTC - in response to Message 1091.

If your task name starts with "BETA_28091846_3000" you can abort it.

[VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 15
Posts: 108
Credit: 403,294
RAC: 0
Message 1093 - Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 5:35:01 UTC - in response to Message 1092.

If your task name starts with "BETA_28091846_3000" you can abort it.


Killed.
Waiting for new work

scole of TSBT
Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 15
Posts: 1
Credit: 4,946,969
RAC: 0
Message 1095 - Posted: 30 Sep 2016, 22:01:22 UTC

Do the project admins need feedback about the beta WUs or do they already have access to the info they need?

Profile jcastro
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 15
Posts: 218
Credit: 14,859
RAC: 0
Message 1097 - Posted: 1 Oct 2016, 9:45:51 UTC - in response to Message 1095.

We are starting with small batches, now the information that the "system" give to us is sufficient. It that last upgrade, we have change the checkpoint so if you want to help us a lot, you can do a lot of "stop/pause" with the WUs of Beta. We will launch more WUs in few days.

Regards, Joel.

Dr. Merkw├╝rdigliebe
Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 15
Posts: 6
Credit: 105,476
RAC: 0
Message 1100 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 16:32:52 UTC

Might this be a problem?

<core_client_version>7.6.31</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
MName:CRLP2011_EPI
MID:6
LENGTH: ALG : 118 ,RAT: 40 ,CONS: 111
OpT:3000000.000000
DT:0.002000
OutFreq:50
InT:2999000.000000
NumConstToChange:6
NumStatesToPrint:1
NumAlgToPrint:0
CC ID:26 NAME: G_to in component Transient_Outward_K_Current VALUE:0.8
CC ID:28 NAME: G_K1 in component Inward_Rectifier_K_Current VALUE:1
CC ID:29 NAME: G_ClCa in component Ca_Activated_Cl_Current VALUE:0.9
CC ID:31 NAME: G_Cl_B in component Background_Cl_Current VALUE:0.9
CC ID:34 NAME: G_Ca in component L_Type_Calcium_Current VALUE:1
CC ID:16 NAME: G_Na in component Fast_Na_Current VALUE:1
STP ID:0 - V in component membrane
CONFIG END
Checkpoint file not found
Backup Checkpoint file not found

Tex1954
Send message
Joined: 7 Jul 15
Posts: 28
Credit: 28,032,141
RAC: 0
Message 1101 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 16:59:27 UTC

I've suspended, restarted, shut down system and restarted again and the tasks all seem to restart from where they left off just fine.

These are all the BETA_08101257_3000 Wu's I am getting.

Good work so far!!

8-)

Profile Henk Haneveld
Send message
Joined: 31 Jul 15
Posts: 6
Credit: 84,725
RAC: 0
Message 1103 - Posted: 8 Oct 2016, 17:27:13 UTC

I have 2 results running but they are very, very slow.

Based on the up time and the speed of my host I will need about 10 days to finish them and that is double the allowed 5 day deadline.

Admins can the deadline be made longer or should I just kill them?

Profile jcastro
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 15
Posts: 218
Credit: 14,859
RAC: 0
Message 1105 - Posted: 10 Oct 2016, 10:51:37 UTC - in response to Message 1103.

I have 2 results running but they are very, very slow.

Based on the up time and the speed of my host I will need about 10 days to finish them and that is double the allowed 5 day deadline.

Admins can the deadline be made longer or should I just kill them?


Hi!

Could you send me the id of your host. It's really strange that computational cost.

Best regards, Joel.

[VENETO] boboviz
Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 15
Posts: 108
Credit: 403,294
RAC: 0
Message 1106 - Posted: 21 Oct 2016, 17:16:56 UTC

News??


Post to thread

Message boards : Number crunching : Got some beta 1.06 work!


Main page · Your account · Message boards


Copyright © 2019 Universidad San Jorge