Task Values
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Task Values
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 NflightSend message Joined: 13 Apr 15 Posts: 3 Credit: 70,028 RAC: 0   
|
No where does it define what is best or worst but, the average person/team crunching data request equal and compassionate compensation for their electrons they are charged. So currently your tasks credits are running about 6 hours of duration and only crediting nearly 15 to 16 points per hour, for this work completed and validated. The average credit most projects portray is around 60 points per hour per task. This would mean a 4X improvement in your current points values doled out. We would appreciate a change now that you have evolved out of Alpha stage and moved into Beta testing. Thank You |
|
Send message Joined: 8 Mar 16 Posts: 7 Credit: 209,249 RAC: 0
|
No where does it define what is best or worst but, the average person/team crunching data request equal and compassionate compensation for their electrons they are charged. So currently your tasks credits are running about 6 hours of duration and only crediting nearly 15 to 16 points per hour, for this work completed and validated. The average credit most projects portray is around 60 points per hour per task. This would mean a 4X improvement in your current points values doled out. We would appreciate a change now that you have evolved out of Alpha stage and moved into Beta testing. Thank You The credits per hour vary massively between machines, type of processor (CPU, GPU and ASIC). Furthermore, the method of determining credits is related to the GFLOPs done as required by BOINC. In simple terms comparing credits between projects is meaningless. If you want big credits run an ASIC miner for Bitcoin Utopia and become a zillionaire! |
sir spuddly buddly Send message Joined: 30 Aug 15 Posts: 47 Credit: 1,248,591 RAC: 0  
|
|
